Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance
I had the great pleasure of interviewing Matt Taibbi this week. We talked about Kamala Harris’ fitness to be a Presidential Candidate, how Matt thinks it is ‘strange’ no questions are being asked about how Harris became the nominee, the failures of the Trump assassination attempt, why Matt thinks ‘profound’ changes are taking place in how Americans think about the world, and the future of government overreach in the U.S.
Taibbi is the head of Racket News and his reputation as a fearless investigative journalist precedes him. From his groundbreaking coverage of the 2008 financial crisis to his more recent explorations of censorship with the Twitter Files, politics, systemic inequality and the inner workings of Congress, Taibbi's body of work reflects a deep commitment to uncovering truths and challenging conventional narratives.
On the recommendation of one of my readers, I first asked Matt how he finds the courage to do what he does. He told me: “I guess the sincere answer to that is I started my journalism career overseas in post-communist Russia. Some of my first mentors in journalism were actually Russian investigative journalists. They had just been given freedom of the press, free speech, sort of. But it was a very hazardous environment where if you wrote the wrong thing, people were getting blown up by exploding suitcases shot in their doorways, people jumping through windows with crowbars, that kind of thing.”
He continued: “So I watched those people work for like eight years. So anytime anybody talks about people like me being brave, I always kind of feel like rolling my eyes a little bit because, you know, in other parts of the world, journalists go through much tougher things and take much bigger risks. So the least we can do is what the job is. And I think, you know, journalists mostly, we're not rocket scientists or doctors. The main job requirement is being, you know, willing to say obnoxious things to powerful people. I think, you know, that's kind of the job baseline."
From there, I asked Matt what unsuspecting countries people should know are now similarly censoring speech. His answer surprised me: "Well, in this new age of digital censorship, there's a whole bunch of countries that you have to worry about now. I mean, I have a friend who got arrested in Germany. He's a playwright who published a book. He was critical of the COVID policy, and he was trying to imply that the modern sort of health authorities were compared to, you know, he wanted to compare them satirically kind of to Nazis. So he, he, on the cover of his book is a mat, a white mask with a faintly visible white swastika. And you know, he gets, he's up on charges now, you know, and there are a lot of these new digital censorship laws carry actual sentences that you can actually go to jail for, for, you know, putting the wrong social media post up, saying the wrong thing, but putting the wrong image in an advertisement or online.”
“This is happening in different places around Europe. Scotland just passed a very tough law. Canada is considering passing one of the more bizarre laws of I've actually seen in speech,” Matt told me. “It actually likely will pass and you can be convicted if they pass that they'll be able to convict you for things you haven't even done yet. So there's all kinds of stuff that they're doing in the West, which are really scary. And that's one of the things that I think Americans don't pay attention to because we only watch our own stuff and we don't pay attention to what's going on in our, you know, even our close allies."
I then asked Matt about the bizarre swap of Joe Biden as the Democrats’ presidential candidate.
Matt told me: “Since 1968, we've had a system that has heavily relied on actual voters choosing those nominees. And they just decided kind of unilaterally to not do that this year. They did it twice. They did it in the primary season with Biden when they, for instance, Florida just canceled its primary and handed the delegates to Biden. New Hampshire did something even weirder where they held a primary. People went and cast votes. Then they canceled those results and held a second thing they called a nominating event on a Saturday night that was not open to the public, and they just had a bunch of party officials there who signed Joe Biden's name to their delegates.”
I also asked Matt about the Trump assassination attempt, which I wrote about in my article Fearless. Matt explained why he thought something about the attempt simply didn't add up. We talked about that, the methodology of Joe Biden being replaced by Kamala Harris, the loss of civil liberties and much, much more.
You can read and listen to the full interview with Matt here.
QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. These positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.
Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance
I had the great pleasure of interviewing Matt Taibbi this week. We talked about Kamala Harris’ fitness to be a Presidential Candidate, how Matt thinks it is ‘strange’ no questions are being asked about how Harris became the nominee, the failures of the Trump assassination attempt, why Matt thinks ‘profound’ changes are taking place in how Americans think about the world, and the future of government overreach in the U.S.
Taibbi is the head of Racket News and his reputation as a fearless investigative journalist precedes him. From his groundbreaking coverage of the 2008 financial crisis to his more recent explorations of censorship with the Twitter Files, politics, systemic inequality and the inner workings of Congress, Taibbi's body of work reflects a deep commitment to uncovering truths and challenging conventional narratives.
On the recommendation of one of my readers, I first asked Matt how he finds the courage to do what he does. He told me: “I guess the sincere answer to that is I started my journalism career overseas in post-communist Russia. Some of my first mentors in journalism were actually Russian investigative journalists. They had just been given freedom of the press, free speech, sort of. But it was a very hazardous environment where if you wrote the wrong thing, people were getting blown up by exploding suitcases shot in their doorways, people jumping through windows with crowbars, that kind of thing.”
He continued: “So I watched those people work for like eight years. So anytime anybody talks about people like me being brave, I always kind of feel like rolling my eyes a little bit because, you know, in other parts of the world, journalists go through much tougher things and take much bigger risks. So the least we can do is what the job is. And I think, you know, journalists mostly, we're not rocket scientists or doctors. The main job requirement is being, you know, willing to say obnoxious things to powerful people. I think, you know, that's kind of the job baseline."
From there, I asked Matt what unsuspecting countries people should know are now similarly censoring speech. His answer surprised me: "Well, in this new age of digital censorship, there's a whole bunch of countries that you have to worry about now. I mean, I have a friend who got arrested in Germany. He's a playwright who published a book. He was critical of the COVID policy, and he was trying to imply that the modern sort of health authorities were compared to, you know, he wanted to compare them satirically kind of to Nazis. So he, he, on the cover of his book is a mat, a white mask with a faintly visible white swastika. And you know, he gets, he's up on charges now, you know, and there are a lot of these new digital censorship laws carry actual sentences that you can actually go to jail for, for, you know, putting the wrong social media post up, saying the wrong thing, but putting the wrong image in an advertisement or online.”
“This is happening in different places around Europe. Scotland just passed a very tough law. Canada is considering passing one of the more bizarre laws of I've actually seen in speech,” Matt told me. “It actually likely will pass and you can be convicted if they pass that they'll be able to convict you for things you haven't even done yet. So there's all kinds of stuff that they're doing in the West, which are really scary. And that's one of the things that I think Americans don't pay attention to because we only watch our own stuff and we don't pay attention to what's going on in our, you know, even our close allies."
I then asked Matt about the bizarre swap of Joe Biden as the Democrats’ presidential candidate.
Matt told me: “Since 1968, we've had a system that has heavily relied on actual voters choosing those nominees. And they just decided kind of unilaterally to not do that this year. They did it twice. They did it in the primary season with Biden when they, for instance, Florida just canceled its primary and handed the delegates to Biden. New Hampshire did something even weirder where they held a primary. People went and cast votes. Then they canceled those results and held a second thing they called a nominating event on a Saturday night that was not open to the public, and they just had a bunch of party officials there who signed Joe Biden's name to their delegates.”
I also asked Matt about the Trump assassination attempt, which I wrote about in my article Fearless. Matt explained why he thought something about the attempt simply didn't add up. We talked about that, the methodology of Joe Biden being replaced by Kamala Harris, the loss of civil liberties and much, much more.
You can read and listen to the full interview with Matt here.
QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. These positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.