Frankie Cordeira Jr.

Description: If you oppose carbon dioxide then you hate rainforests ecosystems trees and all life on our planet (Natural News) Wed all like to think that experts who speak out about issues like the environment have a solid educational background to back up their stances but it appears that some of the loudest voices in the climate change debate have failed basic biology. When the public hears people like Bill Nye Neil DeGrasse Tyson Al Gore and Barack Obama going on about getting rid of carbon dioxide its understandable that they might assume these individuals know what they are talking about and perhaps even start hating carbon dioxide themselves. However anyone who took biology in high school can tell you that carbon dioxide is an essential component of life. How is it then that public figures like them can claim to love the Earth and all its trees and rainforests while espousing an action that wouldkill all of those things? Were all of these carbon dioxide haters sick the day their science teacher covered photosynthesis? The truth is that without carbon dioxide we wouldnt have anything they claim they are trying to protect: Forests wetlands ecosystems or even themselves. Its hard to believe they are honestly suggesting that eliminating carbon dioxide would make the world a better place. This means they are either woefully misinformed or theyre lying about their goals and the fact that some of them have claimed the earth is overpopulated might lead one to believe its the latter. Mike Adams the Health Ranger breaks down the importance of carbon dioxide nicely in his video on Health Ranger Science called Carbon Dioxide: The Miracle Molecule of Life. Its well worth a watch regardless of where you stand on the debate. The imagery of what some of the worlds biggest cities would actually look like without carbon dioxide drives the point home. You wouldnt want to live in that version of Los Angeles Toronto or New York City nor could you because there would be no carbon dioxide to sustain you or the food crops you need for nourishment. Getting rid of carbon dioxide certainly is one way to solve that pesky overpopulation problem! Fact vs theory Climate science is full of contradictions and scientists are unable to agree on the matter. There are so many factors at play that its hard to pin current problems on any single factor. Even the administrator of the EPA Scott Pruitt has gone on the record as saying that he doesnt believe carbon dioxide is a primary contributor to global warming while the public stance of the EPA is the opposite. When it comes to climate change lots of theories are circulating and its a mistake to ascribe the ones espoused by the mainstream as being actual facts when the truth is that no one can say for certain. As Pruitt points out its difficult to accurately measure the impact of human activity on the climate which is why there is so much dissent. Of course too much of a good thing can be a bad thing and carbon dioxide is indeed a toxic gas at high concentrations. No one wants to see levels spiral out of control but eliminating it altogether would spell the end of life as we know it. Sources include: NaturalNews.com NaturalNews.com
By Frankie Cordeira Jr.
Pinned to Domestic and Global News on Pinterest
Found on: http://ift.tt/2rNsyPJ